Drug updated on 12/11/2024
Dosage Form | Tablet (oral; 20 mg) |
Drug Class | Kinase inhibitors |
Ongoing and Completed Studies | ClinicalTrials.gov |
Indication
- Indicated for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma with a BRAF V600E or V600K mutation, in combination with vemurafenib
- Indicated for the treatment of adult patients with histiocytic neoplasms, as a single agent.
Latest News
Summary
- This summary is based on the review of seven systematic review(s)/meta-analysis(es). [1-7]
- Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Response Rate (ORR): Cobimetinib combined with vemurafenib and atezolizumab demonstrated superior PFS (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.56 [95% CI 0.37-0.84]) and ORR (risk ratio (RR) = 3.07 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.61-5.85]) compared to ipilimumab/nivolumab, with similar efficacy outcomes reported when cobimetinib/vemurafenib was compared to dabrafenib/trametinib and encorafenib/binimetinib.
- Overall Survival (OS) in BRAF-V600 Mutations: In patients with BRAF(V600)-mutated metastatic melanoma, dabrafenib-trametinib treatment showed a favorable effect on OS compared to vemurafenib-cobimetinib, highlighting a beneficial outcome in this subgroup. Additionally, for patients experiencing progression post-cobimetinib and vemurafenib treatment, subsequent therapies improved post-progression overall survival (ppOS).
- Effectiveness in Subpopulations with Prognostic Factors: In patients treated with cobimetinib and vemurafenib, higher baseline lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels (>2 x upper limit of normal) were associated with the shortest ppOS, identifying a prognostic factor that may inform treatment considerations in specific subgroups.
- Grade ≥3 Treatment-Related Adverse Events (TRAEs): Cobimetinib combined in triplet therapy with vemurafenib and atezolizumab trended toward a lower risk of Grade ≥3 TRAEs when compared to ipilimumab/nivolumab (RR = 0.71 [95% CI 0.30-1.67]).
- Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Discontinuations: Encorafenib plus binimetinib, when compared to vemurafenib plus cobimetinib, was associated with fewer SAEs and lower discontinuation rates due to adverse events, suggesting a potentially favorable safety profile for patients undergoing combination therapy with encorafenib and binimetinib.
- Baseline factors such as LDH levels greater than twice the upper limit, advanced disease stage, and poor performance status were identified as significant prognostic indicators for shorter ppOS in patients treated with cobimetinib and vemurafenib.
Product Monograph / Prescribing Information
Document Title | Year | Source |
---|---|---|
Cotellic (cobimetinib) Prescribing Information. | 2023 | Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA |
Systematic Reviews / Meta-Analyses
Clinical Practice Guidelines
Document Title | Year | Source |
---|---|---|
European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline for melanoma. Part 2: Treatment - Update 2022 | 2022 | European Journal of Cancer |
Clinical practice guideline on melanoma from the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV) | 2021 | Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas |
European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline for melanoma. Part 2: Treatment – Update 2019 | 2020 | European Journal of Cancer |
Systemic therapy for melanoma: ASCO guideline | 2020 | Journal of Clinical Oncology |