Drug updated on 11/1/2024
Dosage Form | Injection (intravenous; 10 mg, 30 mg, 60 mg) |
Drug Class | Proteasome inhibitors |
Ongoing and Completed Studies | ClinicalTrials.gov |
Indication
- Indicated for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who have received one to three lines of therapy in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone, dexamethasone, daratumumab and dexamethasone, daratumumab and hyaluronidase-fihj and dexamethasone, or isatuximab and dexamethasone
- Indicated for use as a single agent for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who have received one or more lines of therapy.
Latest News
Summary
- This summary is based on the review of 17 systematic review(s)/meta-analysis(es). [1-17]
- Proteasome inhibitors, including carfilzomib, significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in multiple myeloma (MM) maintenance therapy, with bortezomib exhibiting superior OS over carfilzomib.
- In newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), carfilzomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone (KRd) showed higher complete response rates and measurable residual disease negativity compared to bortezomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone (VRd), with improved PFS in high-risk cytogenetic patients.
- Carfilzomib-based regimens demonstrated superior objective response rates (ORRs) over bortezomib-based treatments in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), ranking highly among RRMM therapies and showing favorable safety.
- For lenalidomide-refractory MM, carfilzomib/dexamethasone provided better outcomes compared to bortezomib/dexamethasone, especially in maintaining efficacy in high-risk cytogenetic profiles.
- Carfilzomib was associated with adverse effects, including peripheral neuropathy, serious adverse events, rash, vomiting, hematological toxicity, and notably high-grade cardiovascular toxicity, such as hypertension, heart failure, edema, and ischemia, with a similar incidence of cardiotoxicity observed in both newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory patients.
- Carfilzomib showed a significant risk of kidney toxicity, with an observed cumulative rate of 21.3% for all-grade kidney toxicity and 8.3% for grades 3-5 kidney toxicities.
- Compared to bortezomib, carfilzomib had a lower incidence of neuropathy but presented higher cumulative and relative risks of kidney toxicity and higher rates of cardiovascular toxicity.
- Carfilzomib-based therapies demonstrated significant efficacy in improving progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with high-risk cytogenetics, lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma (MM), newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), and relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), particularly within subpopulations benefiting from triplet therapies and regimens combining monoclonal antibodies, with favorable response rates and safety profiles.
Product Monograph / Prescribing Information
Document Title | Year | Source |
---|---|---|
Kyprolis (carfilzomib) Prescribing Information. | 2022 | Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA |
Systematic Reviews / Meta-Analyses
Clinical Practice Guidelines
Document Title | Year | Source |
---|---|---|
Disparities in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: recommendations from an interprofessional consensus panel | 2024 | Blood Cancer Journal |
Multiple myeloma, version 2.2024, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. | 2023 | Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network |
Clinical practice guideline - Multiple myeloma. | 2022 | Myeloma Australia |
Multiple myeloma: EHA-ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. | 2021 | Annals of Oncology |
Multiple Myeloma, Version 3.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology | 2020 | Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network |
Treatment of relapsed multiple myeloma: Evidence-based recommendations | 2020 | Blood Reviews |
Association of hypertension and cardiac events in patients with multiple myeloma receiving carfilzomib: practical management recommendations | 2020 | British Journal of Haematology |