Dimethyl fumarate

(Tecfidera®)

Tecfidera®

Drug updated on 9/4/2024

Dosage FormCapsule (oral; 120 mg, 240 mg)
Drug ClassNuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2 (Nrf2) activators
Ongoing and
Completed Studies
ClinicalTrials.gov

Indication

  • For the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS), to include clinically isolated syndrome, relapsing-remitting disease, and active secondary progressive disease, in adults.

Latest News

loading GIF

Summary
This AI-generated content is provided without warranty, with no liability accepted for reliance on it. Learn more.

  • Tecfidera (dimethyl fumarate) is indicated for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS), including clinically isolated syndrome, relapsing-remitting disease, and active secondary progressive disease in adults.
  • This summary is based on the review of 15 systematic review(s)/meta-analysis(es). [1-15]
  • Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) was slightly more effective than teriflunomide in reducing short-term relapse risk (RR=0.92, p=0.01). Alemtuzumab, mitoxantrone, natalizumab, and fingolimod were more effective than DMF in reducing relapse risk within the first 24 months, with alemtuzumab showing the most significant reduction (RR versus placebo 0.46). Ocrelizumab and DMF both effectively reduced the number of new T2 lesions, with DMF having relative superiority in this outcome.
  • DMF showed no significant impact on short-term confirmed disability worsening (CDW) compared with teriflunomide (RR=0.99, p=0.69). Natalizumab, alemtuzumab, and mitoxantrone were more effective than DMF in preventing short-term disability worsening. Ocrelizumab and DMF were effective in reducing the number of new Gd+T1/hypointense lesions on MRI.
  • DMF 480 mg effectively reduced the number of new T2 lesions and was highly ranked for reducing new Gd+T1/hypointense lesions.
  • Ozanimod demonstrated superior outcomes in confirmed disability progression at 3 months, annualized relapse rate, and the proportion of patients relapsed compared to DMF.
  • General Adverse Events: DMF is associated with higher risks of gastrointestinal-related events (nausea, diarrhea, abdominal pain), flushing, pruritus, and significant lymphopenia, with a Number Needed to Treat for Harm (NNTH) of 29 for severe or life-threatening lymphopenia.
  • Serious Adverse Events (SAEs): DMF did not show a significant increase in SAEs compared to placebo in pooled analyses, while Ozanimod demonstrated fewer overall AEs, SAEs, and discontinuations due to AEs compared to DMF.
  • Pregnancy Outcomes: DMF was linked to the highest prevalence of premature births among disease-modifying therapies (DMTs), with significant occurrences of ectopic pregnancy and spontaneous abortion compared to the general population.
  • The effectiveness of DMF in reducing relapse risk decreases in younger patients and treatment-naïve subjects. A higher incidence of premature births was observed in pregnant women treated with DMF, although overall safety in pregnancy aligns with the general population, barring specific outcomes like ectopic pregnancy and spontaneous abortion. Better outcomes in MS-related PML were noted in patients with lower JCV viral load and younger age at diagnosis.

Product Monograph / Prescribing Information

Document TitleYearSource
Tecfidera (dimethyl fumarate) Prescribing Information.2022Biogen Idec Inc., Cambridge, MA

Systematic Reviews / Meta-Analyses

Document TitleYearSource
Immunomodulators and immunosuppressants for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a network meta-analysis.2024The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Dimethyl fumarate or teriflunomide for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a meta-analysis of post-marketing studies.2023Neurotherapeutics
Disease modifying therapy and pregnancy outcomes in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.2023Journal of Neuroimmunology
Adverse effects of immunotherapies for multiple sclerosis: a network meta-analysis.2023The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Association of disease-modifying therapies with COVID-19 susceptibility and severity in patients with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.2022Multiple Sclerosis International
Post marketing new adverse effects of oral therapies in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review.2022Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
Impact of disease-modifying therapies on MRI outcomes in patients with relapsing -remitting multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.2022Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
Disease-modifying therapies and T1 hypointense lesions in patients with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.2022CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics
Disease modifying therapies in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.2021Autoimmunity Reviews
Comparative efficacy and safety of ozanimod and dimethyl fumarate for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis using matching-adjusted indirect comparison.2021CNS Drugs
Disease-modifying therapies and progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.2021Journal of Neuroimmunology
Safety of dimethyl fumarate for multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. 2020Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
Comparative efficacy and acceptability of disease-modifying therapies in patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. 2020Journal of Neurology
Disease modifying therapies in multiple sclerosis: cost-effectiveness systematic review.2020Farmacia Hospitalaria
Benefit-risk of therapies for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: testing the Number Needed to Treat to Benefit (NNTB), Number Needed to Treat to Harm (NNTH) and the likelihood to be helped or harmed (LHH): a systematic review and meta-analysis.2020CNS Drugs