Eltrombopag

(Promacta®)

Promacta®

Drug updated on 11/4/2024

Dosage FormTablet (oral; 12.5 mg, 25 mg, 50 mg, and 75 mg); Oral suspension (oral; 12.5 mg, 25 mg)
Drug ClassThrombopoietin receptor agonists
Ongoing and
Completed Studies
ClinicalTrials.gov

Indication

  • Indicated for the treatment of thrombocytopenia in adult and pediatric patients 1 year and older with persistent or chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) who have had an insufficient response to corticosteroids, immunoglobulins, or splenectomy
  • PROMACTA should be used only in patients with ITP whose degree of thrombocytopenia and clinical condition increase the risk for bleeding
  • Indicated for the treatment of thrombocytopenia in patients with chronic hepatitis C to allow the initiation and maintenance of interferon-based therapy
  • PROMACTA should be used only in patients with chronic hepatitis C whose degree of thrombocytopenia prevents the initiation of interferon-based therapy or limits the ability to maintain interferon-based therapy
  • Indicated in combination with standard immunosuppressive therapy for the first-line treatment of adult and pediatric patients 2 years and older with severe aplastic anemia
  • Indicated for the treatment of patients with severe aplastic anemia who have had an insufficient response to immunosuppressive therapy.

Latest News

loading GIF

Summary
This AI-generated content is provided without warranty, with no liability accepted for reliance on it. Learn more.

  • This summary is based on the review of 14 systematic review(s)/meta-analysis(es). [1-14]
  • In severe aplastic anemia (SAA), eltrombopag combined with immunosuppressive therapy (IST) showed a significantly higher overall response rate (ORR) at 3 months (OR (odds ratio) = 2.10) and 6 months (OR = 2.13), with no significant difference by 12 months (OR = 1.13). The complete response rate (CRR) was similarly higher at 3 months (OR = 2.73) and 6 months (OR = 2.76), but not at 12 months (OR = 1.38). The overall survival rate (OSR) was improved (OR = 1.70), with a higher relapse rate in the experimental group (54% vs. 39%).
  • Eltrombopag as a single agent led to blood count improvement in 40-50% of severe aplastic anemia patients.
  • In immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), eltrombopag resulted in a significantly better platelet response compared to placebo in adults (RR (relative risk) = 3.65) but not in children (RR = 3.93). Comparative effectiveness showed avatrombopag had better platelet response in adults, and romiplostim ranked higher overall in network meta-analyses.
  • Eltrombopag achieved a durable platelet response and reduced the need for concomitant ITP medications relative to placebo, though avatrombopag and romiplostim were often ranked higher in comparative studies.
  • In severe aplastic anemia (SAA), no significant differences in event-free survival rate (EFSR) or clonal evolution rate were observed between eltrombopag combined with immunosuppressive therapy and immunosuppressive therapy alone.
  • For immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), no significant increase in thrombotic events was noted with eltrombopag treatment, and the safety profile was similar to that of romiplostim and avatrombopag regarding adverse events.
  • Specific adverse effects included increased pigment deposition and abnormal liver function with eltrombopag in combination with immunosuppressive therapy; a lower incidence of bleeding was observed in children treated with eltrombopag.
  • There is no population type or subgroup information available in the reviewed studies.

Product Monograph / Prescribing Information

Document TitleYearSource
Promacta (eltrombopag) Prescribing Information.2023Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ

Systematic Reviews / Meta-Analyses

Document TitleYearSource
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Eltrombopag Efficacy Combined With Immunosuppressive Drugs in Treatment of Severe Aplastic Anemia2024Cureus
Efficacy and safety of immunosuppressive therapy combined with eltrombopag for severe aplastic anemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis2024Systematic Reviews
Safety and efficacy of eltrombopag in patients with aplastic anemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials2024Hematology (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
Thrombopoietin receptor agonists use and risk of thrombotic events in patients with immune thrombocytopenic purpura: A systematic review and meta‑analysis of randomized controlled trials2024Biomedical Reports
Eltrombopag for Adults and Children with Immune-Refractory Thrombocytopenic Purpura: A Systematic Review2023Journal of Clinical Medicine
Risk of thrombotic events in immune thrombocytopenia patients treated with thrombopoietic agents: a systematic review and meta-analysis2023Thrombosis Journal
The efficacy and the safety of eltrombopag in pediatric patients with severe aplastic anemia: a systematic review2023Frontiers in Pediatrics
Efficacy and safety of thrombopoietin receptor agonists in children and adults with persistent and chronic immune thrombocytopenia: a meta-analysis2023Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy
Efficacy and Incidence of Treatment-Related Adverse Events of Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists in Adults with Immune Thrombocytopenia: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Study2023Acta Haematologica
Thrombopoietin receptor agonists and rituximab for treatment of pediatric immune thrombocytopenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective clinical trials2022Pediatric Blood & Cancer
Efficacy and Safety of Avatrombopag in Patients with Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenia: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-Analysis2021Advances in therapy
Eltrombopag Effectiveness and Tolerability in Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenia: A Meta-Analysis2021Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
Treatment efficacy for adult persistent immune thrombocytopenia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis2020British Journal of Haematology
Therapeutic options for adult patients with previously treated immune thrombocytopenia - a systematic review and network meta-analysis2019Hematology (Amsterdam, Netherlands)

Clinical Practice Guidelines