Drug updated on 12/11/2024
Dosage Form | Injection (subcutaneous; 60 mg/mL ) |
Drug Class | RANK ligand (RANKL) inhibitors |
Ongoing and Completed Studies | ClinicalTrials.gov |
Indication
- Indicated for the treatment of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis at high risk for fracture
- Indicated for the treatment to increase bone mass in men with osteoporosis at high risk for fracture
- Indicated for the treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in men and women at high risk for fracture
- Indicated for the treatment to increase bone mass in men at high risk for fracture receiving androgen deprivation therapy for nonmetastatic prostate cancer
- Indicated for the treatment to increase bone mass in women at high risk for fracture receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy for breast cancer.
Latest News
Summary
- This summary is based on the review of five systematic review(s)/meta-analysis(es). [1-5]
- Bone Mineral Density (BMD) and Fracture Reduction: Denosumab was associated with significant increases in BMD and reduction in vertebral, hip, and non-vertebral fractures compared to placebo and bisphosphonates. It demonstrated the highest effectiveness in increasing total hip BMD and preventing secondary osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures in network meta-analysis.
- Falls Reduction: Denosumab significantly reduced the incidence of non-fracture-related falls (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.79; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66-0.93; p = 0.0061) in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis, men with osteoporosis, and cancer patients on specific therapies.
- Comparative Effectiveness: Denosumab ranked highest in increasing total hip BMD (surface under the cumulative ranking curve SUCRA) 99.7%) and was effective across various populations, including postmenopausal women, men with osteoporosis, cancer patients, and those with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP).
- Denosumab treatment was associated with an increased risk of any infection (relative risk (RR) 1.11; 95% CI 1.02-1.20; P = 0.02) compared with bisphosphonates, but not placebo. Additionally, there was a higher incidence of serious adverse events of infection (SAEI) (RR 1.21; 95% CI 1.03-1.43; P = 0.02) in denosumab-treated patients compared to placebo, though not bisphosphonates.
- Compared to other osteoporosis drugs, denosumab had fewer gastrointestinal complaints and led to fewer discontinuations due to adverse events.
Product Monograph / Prescribing Information
Document Title | Year | Source |
---|---|---|
Prolia (denosumab) Prescribing Information. | 2024 | Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA |
Systematic Reviews / Meta-Analyses
Clinical Practice Guidelines
Document Title | Year | Source |
---|---|---|
Management of Osteoporosis in Survivors of Adult Cancers With Nonmetastatic Disease: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline | 2019 | Journal of Clinical Oncology |