Lorlatinib

(Lorbrena®)

Lorbrena®

Drug updated on 9/4/2024

Dosage FormTablet (oral; 25 mg, 100 mg)
Drug ClassKinase inhibitors
Ongoing and
Completed Studies
ClinicalTrials.gov

Indication

  • Indicated for the treatment of adult patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose tumors are anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive as detected by an FDA-approved test.

Latest News

loading GIF

Summary
This AI-generated content is provided without warranty, with no liability accepted for reliance on it. Learn more.

  • Lorbrena (lorlatinib) is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose tumors are anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive as detected by an FDA-approved test.
  • This summary is based on the review of nine systematic review(s)/meta-analysis(es). [1-9]
  • Progression-Free Survival (PFS): Lorlatinib demonstrated the highest probability of favorable PFS among ALK inhibitors globally, especially in patients with baseline brain metastases, while alectinib was notably superior in Asian patients.
  • Overall Survival (OS): Alectinib significantly prolonged OS compared to crizotinib and showed the best OS among all ALK inhibitors globally, with no significant difference in OS observed between lorlatinib and crizotinib due to limited follow-up.
  • Objective Response Rate (ORR): Lorlatinib exhibited the highest ORR among global patients, with alectinib following closely, and was significantly more effective than crizotinib in achieving the best ORR.
  • Lorlatinib had a high incidence of grade 3-5 adverse events (91.6%), including hypertriglyceridemia, hypercholesterolemia, weight gain, cognitive effects, and mood effects, making it one of the least safe ALK inhibitors. Conversely, alectinib demonstrated the lowest rate of grade 3-4 adverse events (16.2%), followed by crizotinib (46.4%) and brigatinib (63.7%).
  • Alectinib was notably effective and had the best safety profile for patients with baseline brain metastases and crizotinib-resistant patients. In the Asian population, alectinib and ensartinib had lower rates of severe adverse events compared to other ALK inhibitors.
  • There is no population-type or subgroup information available in the reviewed studies.

Product Monograph / Prescribing Information

Document TitleYearSource
Lorbrena (lorlatinib) Prescribing Information.2023Pfizer Inc., New York, NY

Systematic Reviews / Meta-Analyses

Document TitleYearSource
Identifying optimal ALK inhibitors in first- and second-line treatment of patients with advanced ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis2024BMC Cancer
Comparing efficacy and safety of upfront treatment strategies for anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung cancer: a network meta-analysis2023Exploration of Targeted Anti-Tumor Therapy
Comparative safety of anaplastic lymphoma kinase tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase-mutated non-small cell lung cancer: Systematic review and network meta-analysis2023Lung Cancer
A Bayesian network meta-analysis of ALK inhibitor treatments in patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer.2023Cancer Medicine
Efficacy and safety of first-line treatments for patients with advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase mutated, non–small cell cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.2023Cancer
Toxicity profile of anaplastic lymphoma kinase tyrosine kinase inhibitors for patients with non‑small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta‑analysis.2022Investigational New Drugs
ALK inhibitors in ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer with and without brain metastases: Systematic review and network meta-analysis.2022BMJ Open
Targeted therapy for advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)‐rearranged non‐small cell lung cancer.2022The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Comparative efficacy and safety of lorlatinib and alectinib for ALK-rearrangement positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer in Asian and non-Asian patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.2021Cancers

Clinical Practice Guidelines