Risdiplam

(Evrysdi®)

Evrysdi®

Drug updated on 9/4/2024

Dosage FormSolution (oral; 60 mg [0.75 mg/mL])
Drug ClassSurvival of motor neuron 2 splicing modifiers
Ongoing and
Completed Studies
ClinicalTrials.gov

Indication

  • Indicated for the treatment of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) in pediatric and adult patients.

Latest News

loading GIF

Summary
This AI-generated content is provided without warranty, with no liability accepted for reliance on it. Learn more.

  • Evrysdi (risdiplam) is indicated for the treatment of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) in pediatric and adult patients.
  • This summary is based on the review of five systematic review(s)/meta-analysis(es). [1-5]
  • CHOP-INTEND (SMA Type 1): After 12 months of treatment with risdiplam, 57% of participants achieved a CHOP-INTEND score ≥ 40 points. Over half of these participants were able to feed orally and maintain head control.
  • Motor Function Measures (SMA Type 2/3): Risdiplam increased MFM32 scores by 2.09 points, RULM scores by 1.73 points, and HFMSE scores by 1.00 point. However, the effect on respiratory function in this group was inconsistent.
  • Comparison with Nusinersen: For SMA Type 2/3, nusinersen resulted in greater increases in HFMSE (4.90 points) and RULM (3.70 points) compared to risdiplam's 0.87 and 1.73 points, respectively. Nusinersen also increased HINE-2 scores by 5.21 points.
  • Adverse Events: 16% of participants treated with risdiplam experienced adverse events. Serious adverse events could not be quantified due to a lack of reported cases.
  • Comparison with Other Drugs: No statistically significant differences were observed between risdiplam and nusinersen in the rate of adverse events (OR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.51, 1.7; p = 0.82) or severe adverse events (OR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.47, 1.27; p = 0.31).
  • The evidence source includes studies on SMA phenotypes Type 1 and Types 2/3, with varying effectiveness of risdiplam observed by phenotype, particularly in motor function improvements for Type 1, and no specific subgroup safety concerns identified, but adverse events reported in 16% of participants without detailed subgroup-specific data.