Alectinib

(Alecensa®)

Alecensa®

Drug updated on 12/11/2024

Dosage FormCapsule (oral; 150 mg)
Drug ClassKinase inhibitors
Ongoing and
Completed Studies
ClinicalTrials.gov

Indication

  • Indicated for the treatment of adult patients following tumor resection of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (tumors 4 cm or node positive) as detected by an FDA-approved test
  • Indicated for the treatment of adult patients with ALK-positive metastatic NSCLC as detected by an FDA-approved test.

Latest News

loading GIF

Summary
This AI-generated content is provided without warranty, with no liability accepted for reliance on it. Learn more.

  • This summary is based on the review of 27 systematic review(s)/meta-analysis(es). [1-27]
  • Progression-Free Survival (PFS): Alectinib demonstrated significant improvement in PFS compared to crizotinib and chemotherapy, with lorlatinib showing the best PFS among next-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors, especially effective in patients with brain metastases. Brigatinib also showed superior PFS relative to crizotinib and ceritinib.
  • Overall Survival (OS): Alectinib significantly prolonged OS compared to crizotinib and chemotherapy. Evidence for OS improvement with lorlatinib and brigatinib exists but is less robust than for alectinib.
  • Objective Response Rate (ORR): Alectinib and lorlatinib generally displayed higher ORRs than crizotinib and chemotherapy, with alectinib (600 mg BID) demonstrating the highest ORR among the ALK inhibitors.
  • Intracranial Time to Progression (IC TTP): Both lorlatinib and alectinib effectively prevented central nervous system (CNS) progression compared to other ALK inhibitors, showing significant intracranial efficacy.
  • Adverse Events (AEs): Alectinib demonstrated a favorable safety profile with fewer grade ≥3 AEs compared to other ALK inhibitors, while lorlatinib had a higher incidence of severe AEs, including hypertriglyceridemia and hypercholesterolemia. Ceritinib showed the highest rate of severe AEs among the ALK inhibitors.
  • Discontinuation Due to AEs: Alectinib had the lowest discontinuation rates due to AEs, whereas lorlatinib and brigatinib had higher rates of discontinuation compared to other ALK inhibitors.
  • Comparison of Safety: Lorlatinib presented a higher incidence of severe AEs relative to alectinib and brigatinib, while ceritinib had the highest rate of severe AEs and dose reductions due to AEs among the ALK inhibitors.
  • There is no population type or subgroup information available in the reviewed studies.

Product Monograph / Prescribing Information

Document TitleYearSource
Alecensa (alectinib) Prescribing Information.2024Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA

Systematic Reviews / Meta-Analyses

Document TitleYearSource
Systematic review and network meta-analysis of lorlatinib with comparison to other anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as first-line treatment for ALK-positive advanced non-smallcell lung cancer (NSCLC)2024Lung Cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
Correlation between ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer targeted therapy and thrombosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis2024BMJ Open
Efficacy of ALK inhibitors in Asian patients with ALK inhibitor-naive advanced ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis2024Translational Lung Cancer Research
Identifying optimal ALK inhibitors in first- and second-line treatment of patients with advanced ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis2024BMC Cancer
Comparing efficacy and safety of upfront treatment strategies for anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung cancer: a network meta-analysis2023Exploration of Targeted Anti-Tumor Therapy
Pathological complete response to long-course neoadjuvant alectinib in lung adenocarcinoma with EML4-ALK rearrangement: report of two cases and systematic review of case reports2023Frontiers in Oncology
A Bayesian network meta-analysis of ALK inhibitor treatments in patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer2023Cancer Medicine
Alectinib for treating patients with metastatic ALK-positive NSCLC: systematic review and network metanalysis2023Lung Cancer Management
Cost‑Effectiveness of Lorlatinib in First-Line Treatment of Adult Patients with Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK)‑Positive Non‑Small‑Cell Lung Cancer in Sweden2023Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
Efficacy and safety of anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors for non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis2023Thoracic Cancer
Comparative Efficacy of ALK Inhibitors for Treatment-Naive ALK-Positive Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Central Nervous System Metastasis: A Network Meta-Analysis2023International Journal of Molecular Sciences
First-line treatments for patients with advanced ALK gene rearrangements in NSCLC: a systematic review and network meta-analysis2022The Journal of International Medical Research
Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Brigatinib in First-Line Treatments for Patients with Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Indirect Treatment Comparison2022Journal of Clinical Medicine
Impact of Smoking on Response to the First-Line Treatment of Advanced ALK-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis2022Frontiers in Pharmacology
A Systematic Review of Companion Diagnostic Tests by Immunohistochemistry for the Screening of Alectinib-Treated Patients in ALK-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer2022Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
Toxicity profile of anaplastic lymphoma kinase tyrosine kinase inhibitors for patients with non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis2022Investigational New Drugs
Targeted therapy for advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase (<I>ALK</I>)-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer2022The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Crizotinib versus Alectinib for the Treatment of ALK-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis2022Chemotherapy
Comparative Efficacy of Systemic Agents for Brain Metastases From Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With an EGFR Mutation/ALK Rearrangement: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis2021Frontiers in Oncology
Comparative efficacy and safety of first-line treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with ALK-rearranged: a meta-analysis of clinical trials2021BMC Cancer
Efficacy and Safety of First-Line Treatment Strategies for Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis2021Frontiers in Oncology
First-Line Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) Inhibitors for ALK-Positive Lung Cancer in Asian Populations: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis2021Journal of Clinical Medicine
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Lorlatinib and Alectinib for ALK-Rearrangement Positive Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Asian and Non-Asian Patients: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis2021Cancers
Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) Inhibitors for Treatment-Naive ALK-Positive Lung Cancer2021Cancers
Effect of alectinib versus crizotinib on progression-free survival, central nervous system efficacy and adverse events in ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis2020Annals of Palliative Medicine
Brigatinib and Alectinib for ALK Rearrangement-Positive Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With or Without Central Nervous System Metastasis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis2020Cancers
ALK inhibitors for non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis2020PloS One